[colug-432] my shell is better^H^H^H^H^H^Hdifferent than yours: NSFW (but not for the reason you might think)
Chris Anderson
canderson at foxtwo.net
Tue Dec 6 11:29:31 EST 2011
What exactly is wrong with just using Ctr-C to cancel this? Seems to work
for me. I don't like the idea of a shell restricting my options to keep me
from doing something dumb. That's what my brain is there for...
I guess it is a matter of opinion, but I like Nanny shells about as much as
I like Nanny states...
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Jeff Frontz <jeff.frontz at gmail.com> wrote:
> On the AST (AT&T Software Technology) user's mailing list, Glen Fowler
> recently posted this snippet:
>
> > ... the seemingly good idea of "no limits" is not always a good idea
> > proof of concept: try this with bash on a system that you can reboot
> with a physical button:
> >
> > bash -c 'read line < /dev/zero'
> >
>
> The context was why doesn't ksh let you read an arbitrarily long line of
> text with the built-in "read" command (and why that limitation is on
> purpose, but unfortunately undocumented).
>
>
> Jeff
>
>
>
>
>
> Spam detection software, running on the system "lists.colug.net", has
> identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
> has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
> similar future email. If you have any questions, see
> the administrator of that system for details.
>
> Content preview: On the AST (AT&T Software Technology) user's mailing
> list,
> Glen Fowler recently posted this snippet: > ... the seemingly good idea
> of
> "no limits" is not always a good idea > proof of concept: try this with
> bash
> on a system that you can reboot with a physical button: > > bash -c 'read
> line < /dev/zero' > [...]
>
> Content analysis details: (5.0 points, 5.0 required)
>
> pts rule name description
> ---- ----------------------
> --------------------------------------------------
> 3.8 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99 to 100%
> [score: 1.0000]
> 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail
> provider
> (vdgr3dok[at]hotmail.com)
> (jeff.frontz[at]gmail.com)
> 1.2 GAPPY_SUBJECT Subject: contains G.a.p.p.y-T.e.x.t
> 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> colug-432 mailing list
> colug-432 at colug.net
> http://lists.colug.net/mailman/listinfo/colug-432
>
> Spam detection software, running on the system "lists.colug.net", has
> identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
> has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
> similar future email. If you have any questions, see
> the administrator of that system for details.
>
> Content preview: On the AST (AT&T Software Technology) user's mailing
> list,
> Glen Fowler recently posted this snippet: > ... the seemingly good idea
> of
> "no limits" is not always a good idea > proof of concept: try this with
> bash
> on a system that you can reboot with a physical button: > > bash -c 'read
> line < /dev/zero' > [...]
>
> Content analysis details: (5.0 points, 5.0 required)
>
> pts rule name description
> ---- ----------------------
> --------------------------------------------------
> 3.8 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99 to 100%
> [score: 1.0000]
> 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail
> provider
> (sefrie-bbs[at]yahoo.com)
> (jeff.frontz[at]gmail.com)
> (jeff.frontz[at]gmail.com)
> 1.2 GAPPY_SUBJECT Subject: contains G.a.p.p.y-T.e.x.t
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.colug.net/pipermail/colug-432/attachments/20111206/cf483aec/attachment.html
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: SpamAssassinReport.txt
Url: http://lists.colug.net/pipermail/colug-432/attachments/20111206/cf483aec/attachment.txt
More information about the colug-432
mailing list