[colug-432] linker is being PICky
rmt at casita.net
Mon Jun 29 11:44:36 EDT 2015
Thanks for the reply and for the tip.
On 06/29/2015 09:51 AM, Jeff Frontz wrote:
> I can't remember the x86 addressing modes (or their implementations),
> but relative-mode addressing can add overhead in some architectures.
> Take a peek at
I was surprised that one build w/o -fPIC appeared to be bigger in size
then the same build with -fPIC. Would expect PIC support to increase the
size, not shrink it. (Or maybe I was cross-eyed.) Did not compare
performance of the two.
The above link, and a wikipedia page it led to, give me some good clues.
> As to knowing if -fPIC is needed -- that's not known
> until you try to build the dependent, right?
Sure, but autoconf/automake discovers things like that by trying a
number of small compiles. Kind of ASSumed this would be covered too.
I stick with the standard recipe as closely as possible. Over the years,
I have collected over 150 packages that I can quickly re-build from the
latest sources. I actively maintain probably half of these, as needed.
Usually the './configure' step figures everything out, so it's easily
automated. Exporting CFLAGS="-fPIC" before that step is my current
work-around. Not elegant.
I have a lot to learn.
-- R; <><
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the colug-432