Not just UI trickery. Rumer has it that Chrome also is cheating a bit by not doing slow-start.<br><br>Chris<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 2:26 PM, Jonathan Hogue <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jon@hogue.org">jon@hogue.org</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">Not _just_ UI trickery. It's actually pretty sophisticated, using a<br>
separate thread for each tab.<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.google.com/googlebooks/chrome/index.html" target="_blank">http://www.google.com/googlebooks/chrome/index.html</a><br>
<div class="im"><br>
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Tom Hanlon <<a href="mailto:tom@functionalmedia.com">tom@functionalmedia.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> Is Firefox the issue ?<br>
><br>
> I just now tried chrome for the first time, on osx so apologize if it behaves differently on linux, but I like the feel of chrome. Seems very responsive, of course that could just be UI trickery, but.. ?<br>
><br>
> --<br>
> Tom<br>
><br>
</div><div><div></div><div class="h5">_______________________________________________<br>
colug-432 mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:colug-432@colug.net">colug-432@colug.net</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.colug.net/mailman/listinfo/colug-432" target="_blank">http://lists.colug.net/mailman/listinfo/colug-432</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>