<p>I emailed time warner about IPV6 just for general information. I was told that time warner was going to install dual stack equipment in each region in 2010-2011 that could handle both IPv4 and IPv6.<br>
I am curious if its going to be available in the next year or so for residential use based on this info. <br>
I hope this info helps. </p>
<p>-Ed </p>
<p><blockquote type="cite">On Feb 27, 2011 11:16 AM, "R P Herrold" <<a href="mailto:herrold@owlriver.com">herrold@owlriver.com</a>> wrote:<br><br>On Sat, 26 Feb 2011, Richard Troth wrote:<br>
<br>
> I'm on TWC/RR cablemodem now, but have also used AT&T/SWBT<br>
> DSL. Biggest appeal of DSL for me was the option of having a<br>
> static address. ... I would love to get IPv6, but am not<br>
> aware of it in Columbus (other than via tunnel).<br>
<br>
Interesting observation. IPv6 (through a tunnel broker, or<br>
native) pretty well solves the need for statics. I've<br>
been in discussion with a datacenter I use for a native<br>
ipv6, and we have gotten an allocationin there as a result.<br>
But I don't know of a residential service provider offering<br>
such in Columbus, yet.<br>
<br>
What is your problem with a tunnelled ipv6 connection? They<br>
are pretty trivial to set up, and I've not noticed any<br>
'lagginess' with the ones I've used?<br>
<br>
-- Russ herrold<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
colug-432 mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:colug-432@colug.net">colug-432@colug.net</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.colug.net/mailman/listinfo/colug-432" target="_blank">http://lists.colug.net/mailman/listinfo/colug-432</a><br>
</blockquote></p>