<font color="#330033"><font size="2"><font face="verdana,sans-serif">Through the process of elimination, I just talked to Gordon, and it was <b>not</b> Scherers that was raided (aka Datacenter.bz).<br><br></font></font></font><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Stephen Potter <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:spp@unixsa.net">spp@unixsa.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 10:11:12 -0400, Ethan Dicks wrote<br>
<div class="im">> On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Joshua Kramer <<a href="mailto:josh@globalherald.net">josh@globalherald.net</a>> wrote:<br>
> ><br>
> > <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703328404576207173861008758.html" target="_blank">http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703328404576207173861008758.html</a><br>
> ><br>
> > Does anyone know which facility in Columbus this was?<br>
><br>
> I was just reading that story and wondering the same thing.<br>
<br>
</div>I wonder more about why Microsoft is being granted permission by the courts to act as a<br>
law enforcement agency. Shouldn't only law enforcement be allowed to be involved in<br>
raids and seizing of equipment?<br>
<br>
-spp<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5">_______________________________________________<br>
colug-432 mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:colug-432@colug.net">colug-432@colug.net</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.colug.net/mailman/listinfo/colug-432" target="_blank">http://lists.colug.net/mailman/listinfo/colug-432</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>