<p>Just to add a data point... I have CenturyLink dsl, out in the middle of nowhere. I just upgraded from 3.5 to 10 and I'm consistently getting 9.5 mbit/sec.</p>
<p>The upgrade was a headache though. They put me on a different dslam and forgot to re-route my static ip. After spending 10 minutes on the phone with a frustrating tier-1 tech who didn't understand that if I can telnet into my modem, removing the wireless router wont make a difference, he bumped me to a tier-3 tech. We spent an hour and a half diagnosing things, only to find that the port on the dslam was bad.</p>
<p>But its worth it... Having 10 mbit in rural knox county is nice!</p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Dec 28, 2012 1:22 AM, "Dan" <<a href="mailto:dcarruth2@columbus.rr.com">dcarruth2@columbus.rr.com</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
I've done a speed test to southern Ohio with my TWC and have had
slow results as well as a few other place .<br>
My speed was just turned up from 10 Megs to 15 Megs and I've ran
several test with the same result as the OP.<br>
<br>
<div>Bill Baker wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre>OK, I have no idea what you're talking about now. Who said anything
about southern Ohio?
On 12/28/2012 01:09 AM, Dan wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre>Ping to southern Ohio can bring slow results.
Bill Baker wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre>That's why I advised him to call tech support. They'll be able to
determine better what the problem is.
On 12/28/2012 12:53 AM, Dan wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre>Did you stop to think that the slow response may be from a slow or busy
server?
Bill Baker wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre>Yeah, I'd definitely talk to tech support if I were you. I can tell you
that as far as I know, TWC doesn't do anything funky to manipulate any
speed test results on their site. It's just a tool to measure how much
bandwidth you're getting within the TWC network. I don't know about
speedboost, since we don't offer that in business class. So far you've
done a lot more work before calling the techs than most people do. But
do call them. And if you're not satisfied with what the first tech
tells you, ask to be escalated to tier 3.
On 12/27/2012 08:20 PM, Rick Hornsby wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre>Got an unsolicited email from Timewarner. They're bumping my speed
from 10 to 15 for free. Supposedly.
Here's where I can't figure out what I'm supposed to tell them, or
the best way to show evidence that something is seriously wrong(?):
KCMO to the following locations, downstream speeds right now:
-> Columbus RR speed test: 30Mbps (?!)
Via the <a href="http://speakeasy.net" target="_blank">speakeasy.net</a> tests at <a href="http://www.speakeasy.net/speedtest/" target="_blank">http://www.speakeasy.net/speedtest/</a>
-> Chicago: 6Mbps
-> Dallas: 15.3Mbps
-> Atlanta: 1.05Mbps
-> New York, NY: 26.65Mbps (?!)
-> Washington, DC: 0.91Mbps
Via the dslreports flash speed test:
-> Denver: 2.5Mbps (other than Kansas City itself, the geographically closest of all)
-> Los Angeles: 4.0Mbps
Via <a href="http://speedtest.net" target="_blank">speedtest.net</a>:
-> Kansas City: 2.67Mbps (this is where I start to get kinda pissed)
-> Kansas City: 3.11Mbps
-> Indepedence, MO (~30mi from KCMO): 25.6Mbps (...?)
-> Overland Park, KS (basically, SW Kansas City): a really sucky 0.34Mbps (was 1.0 on a re-test)
I know there are a lot of factors that go into a download speed, and
that download speed itself isn't everything. I know that some
servers can be overloaded, and that some links can get saturated.
These figures are all over the map - both the location/distance and
the speed. I expect something far more consistent than this mess -
even it is 3Mbps, or 6Mbps, or the full 15. I certainly don't expect
the kind of nonsense for the numbers for Kansas City[1]. Am I
wrong?
Is this even TimeWarner's fault? I can't figure it would be the
local office, unless they're somehow fudging the numbers or doing
something else nefarious to make the Columbus and NYC speeds seem way
faster than they really are --- maybe there is something really
screwy with my cablemodem? It seems like whatever this is, is well
beyond my modem?
Could the TimeWarner "speedboost" caching nonsense be throwing the
numbers off (I haven't and refuse to intentionally subscribe to that
bit of marketing BS)? Does anyone know if the speedtests take that
sort of thing into account?
Maybe I just need to call during the day and talk to technical
support as suggested? Is there a way to increase my odds of getting
a tech support person who might be knowledgeable?
-rick
[1] I recall, some many years ago, a time when Ohio State and Time
Warner had a peering agreement. All was happy in the land of the
remote X session, so few hops that it was. Then something happened.
The peering agreement went away. Packets from two blocks north of
campus flew all over yonder on their way over to KRC (Ohio State's
main data center where all traffic goes in and out of, or did at that
time) - Chicago, Cleveland, sometimes New York City! X sessions were
now slow and nearly impossible. I don't know why it happened or what
went down, but it was annoying to say the least.
_______________________________________________
colug-432 mailing list
<a href="mailto:colug-432@colug.net" target="_blank">colug-432@colug.net</a>
<a href="http://lists.colug.net/mailman/listinfo/colug-432" target="_blank">http://lists.colug.net/mailman/listinfo/colug-432</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre>_______________________________________________
colug-432 mailing list
<a href="mailto:colug-432@colug.net" target="_blank">colug-432@colug.net</a>
<a href="http://lists.colug.net/mailman/listinfo/colug-432" target="_blank">http://lists.colug.net/mailman/listinfo/colug-432</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre>--
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre>_______________________________________________
colug-432 mailing list
<a href="mailto:colug-432@colug.net" target="_blank">colug-432@colug.net</a>
<a href="http://lists.colug.net/mailman/listinfo/colug-432" target="_blank">http://lists.colug.net/mailman/listinfo/colug-432</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre>
--
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre>_______________________________________________
colug-432 mailing list
<a href="mailto:colug-432@colug.net" target="_blank">colug-432@colug.net</a>
<a href="http://lists.colug.net/mailman/listinfo/colug-432" target="_blank">http://lists.colug.net/mailman/listinfo/colug-432</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<div>-- <br>
<img src="cid:part1.08060509.01020908@columbus.rr.com" border="0"></div>
</div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
colug-432 mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:colug-432@colug.net">colug-432@colug.net</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.colug.net/mailman/listinfo/colug-432" target="_blank">http://lists.colug.net/mailman/listinfo/colug-432</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div>