<div dir="ltr">I'm closer than that. It can't be more than 400 feet away, yet the installer found no signal at the pole when he started. I asked questions about the gateway device before the install started and got incorrect and confused answers about it. I should have taken that as a sign and cancelled the installation right then.</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all"><div><br>Robert Grimm<br>Voice only: (614) 212-4625<br><a href="http://www.datablitz.net" target="_blank">http://www.datablitz.net</a><br><a href="http://www.grimmphotography.com" target="_blank">http://www.grimmphotography.com</a><br>
</div>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 11:59 PM, Jeff Stebelton <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jeff.stebelton@gmail.com" target="_blank">jeff.stebelton@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<p dir="ltr">I must have lucked out with my location. They said I'm 1000 feet or so from the DSLAM, one pair was active and they found the other pair in the pedestal, if I have my terminology correct, and hooked it right in. I'm not canceling my Road Runner for at least 3 or 4 days. I'll keep a close watch out for what you're seeing. </p>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">
<div class="gmail_quote">On Mar 1, 2014 11:47 PM, "Robert Grimm" <<a href="mailto:robertgrimm@gmail.com" target="_blank">robertgrimm@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr">I got my U-verse installed on Friday. I'm taking it out on Monday. Netflix looks terrible, Hulu is often bad, the higher latency is noticeable in web browsing, and I don't think I've ever disliked a networking device as much as this gateway. Fortunately, I haven't cancelled my WOW yet.</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all"><div><br>Robert Grimm<br>Voice only: <a href="tel:%28614%29%20212-4625" value="+16142124625" target="_blank">(614) 212-4625</a><br><a href="http://www.datablitz.net" target="_blank">http://www.datablitz.net</a><br>
<a href="http://www.grimmphotography.com" target="_blank">http://www.grimmphotography.com</a><br>
</div>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 8:23 PM, Jeff Stebelton <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jeff.stebelton@gmail.com" target="_blank">jeff.stebelton@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<p dir="ltr">Got my uverse installed today. I'm getting consistent 35 Mbs down and 5 Mbs up. I've seen as high as almost 40 down when I can kick my daughter off of Netflix. I'm a happy man. </p>
<div class="gmail_quote"><div><div>On Feb 19, 2014 6:55 AM, "Stephen P. Molnar" <<a href="mailto:s.molnar@sbcglobal.net" target="_blank">s.molnar@sbcglobal.net</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution">
</div></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div><div>
<div lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple"><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">I switched to U-verse about 15 months ago when the monthly charge for DSL went up again. I didn't realized at the time that the telephone service, included with what I wanted was VOIP! The phone service kept dropping while maintaining the internet connectivity. It took three service calls by techs (?) of questionable ability (I was convince that the first one wasn't sure as to what end of the screwdriver was the handle). To shorten the story a bit the third technician did, indeed, know what he was doing solved the problem. Part of his solution was my calling the AT&T Business Office and demanding that my telephone service be returned to an analog line, while maintaining the same overall monthly rate (that was his suggestion and a learning experience for the customer service person I talked to).<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">All was then well until two months ago when the U-verse bill increased by ~40%, it was the end of the introductory year. I solved that problem by allowing the download rate to be degraded. I'm still getting good transmission rates.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">Bottom line is that I'm satisfied with U-verse (at least so far). Oh yes, they did try to bundle TV with the service, but had no answer to the question 'why should I pay for many channels of garbage when I never watch what's available over the air?'<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">Stephen P. Molnar, Ph.D. Life is a fuzzy set<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">Foundation for Chemistry Stochastic and multivariate<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><a href="http://www.FoundationForChemistry.com" target="_blank">www.FoundationForChemistry.com</a><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><a href="tel:%28614%29312-7528" value="+16143127528" target="_blank">(614)312-7528</a> (c)<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">Skype: smolnar1<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><div style="border:none;border-top:solid #b5c4df 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif""> <a href="mailto:colug-432-bounces@colug.net" target="_blank">colug-432-bounces@colug.net</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:colug-432-bounces@colug.net" target="_blank">colug-432-bounces@colug.net</a>] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Jeff Stebelton<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, February 18, 2014 6:44 PM<br><b>To:</b> David Reed<br><b>Cc:</b> Central OH Linux User Group - 432xx<br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [colug-432] Comcast and connectivity alternatives<u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p><div><div><div><div><div><p class="MsoNormal">I looked at this again and it says:<u></u><u></u></p></div><p class="MsoNormal">Residential AT&T High Speed Internet service includes 150 gigabytes (GB) of data each billing period, and residential AT&T U-verse High Speed Internet service includes 250 Gigabytes (GB) of data each billing period. U-verse with Gigapower, where available, includes 1 terabyte (TB) of data each billing period. The data you send and receive each month contributes to your monthly data plan.<u></u><u></u></p>
</div><p class="MsoNormal">I'm on the U-verse site, looking at Internet only plans and they are calling it U-verse High Speed Internet. It looks to me like I'd be ordering U-verse High Speed which is capped at 250 Gb. Am I missing something? (probably am which is why I'm asking.. =-)<br>
"Get new U-verse High Speed Internet and receive a discounted rate for 12 months... blah blah"<u></u><u></u></p></div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt">And...<u></u><u></u></p></div><p class="MsoNormal">
I watched the video "Broadband Usage Overview" in your link and it also made a distinction between AT&T High Speed Internet and U-verse High Speed Internet. I couldn't find anything that mentioned TV or bundling. Is that hidden and if I sign up I'd find "U-verse High Speed Internet" really means U-verse Bundled TV and High Speed Internet? Not trying to pick at what you said; I just want to make sure if I sign up I know what I'm getting. <u></u><u></u></p>
</div><div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><u></u> <u></u></p><div><p class="MsoNormal">On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 7:54 AM, David Reed <<a href="mailto:dave256@mac.com" target="_blank">dave256@mac.com</a>> wrote:<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">This says 150GB if you don’t also have tv.<br><br><a href="http://www.att.com/esupport/article.jsp?sid=KB409045&cv=812#fbid=wpWmyP0XTGj" target="_blank">http://www.att.com/esupport/article.jsp?sid=KB409045&cv=812#fbid=wpWmyP0XTGj</a><br>
<br>Dave<u></u><u></u></p><div><div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><br>On Feb 17, 2014, at 7:35 AM, Jeff Stebelton <<a href="mailto:jeff.stebelton@gmail.com" target="_blank">jeff.stebelton@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>> I chatted with a service rep who told me it was 250 Gb per month. I'll find that on their site before proceeding. If ordered online they're offering a $50 gift card right now, including Internet only.<br>
> The setup process is telling me:<br>><br>> A $100 one-time Internet equipment fee automatically applies for orders without U-verse TV or orders with select lower Internet speeds.<br>><br>> It's put in the cart as $99.00. Go figure. =-)<br>
> So in my cart I have the following:<br>><br>> AT&T Rewards<br>> Additional online only $50 reward card when you order today! $50.00<br>><br>> Monthly Charges TOTAL $71.95<br>> One-Time Charges TOTAL $99.00<br>
> Your Estimated First Bill* This total is only an estimate of your first bill. The monthly charges on your first bill will be slightly higher than normal. The charges may vary based on the following:<br>><br>> Monthly charges are billed one month in advance<br>
> Prorated monthly charges from date of installation to start of bill period<br>> Taxes, fees, and surcharges<br>> Applicable installation charges<br>><br>> $170.95<br>><br>> My next option is to order, so it looks like the $99.00 install fee is the only one. But I've dealt with AT&T before.. heh.<br>
><br>><br>><br>> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 7:09 AM, <<a href="mailto:davelist@mac.com" target="_blank">davelist@mac.com</a>> wrote:<br>> AT&T only sends the channel(s) you are watching to your house so in effect everything you are watching is streamed to you. Note this means you need one of their boxes on every tv you want to use with their service. So the phone lines can (at least with their current technology) carry a max of 45 Mbps total so 3 HD channels takes over 30 Mbps leaving less than 18 Mbps for internet.<br>
><br>> Rick answered Jeff’s other question, but Jeff, check the 30 day guarantee if you’re just getting internet (and then I think the cap is 150GB instead of 250GB). And I suspect they won’t waive the fees (and no gift card) since they’re not getting as much money from you per month as if you were getting UVerse.<br>
><br>> Dave<br>><br>><br>> On Feb 16, 2014, at 1:27 PM, FiL Farris <<a href="mailto:philipfarris@gmail.com" target="_blank">philipfarris@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>><br>> > When you say your recording HD channels @ 10 - 12 Mbps are you referring to some type of streamed media or HD shows coming into the digital tuner(s) of your cable box?<br>
> ><br>> > On Feb 16, 2014 12:30 PM, <<a href="mailto:davelist@mac.com" target="_blank">davelist@mac.com</a>> wrote:<br>> ><br>> > AT&T has run fiber to newer neighborhoods so you if you are lucky enough to have fiber to your house, you might be able to get those speeds. I made another post about this but maybe you didn’t see it. I finally got fed up with TW (after about 13 years with them) and switched to AT&T U-Verse. I don’t have fiber to my house. There is an AT&T box near my neighborhood (about 1/4 mile straight line distance from my house) that I suspect has fiber to it and then phone lines to my house. I’m paying for the 18 Mbps (and I think 2 Mbps up) service and speed tests report 16-20 Mbps (and 1.5-2 Mbps up) so I’m reasonably happy.<br>
> ><br>> > I think right now the max they can get is 45 Mbps total over the phone line with their current technology so if I’m recording 3 HD channels (I think those take around 10-12 Mbps each), the internet drops to 7-10Mbps, but as long as no more than 2 HD channels, the internet seems consistent (where I live in Hilliard - obviously YMMV). I hear that max over phone lines may go up to 70 Mbps this year in which case I shouldn’t see any slowdown when recording 3 HD channels. But I don’t think you’ll get 45 Mbps internet if you’re watching/recording tv unless you have fiber to your house.<br>
> ><br>> > AT&T will give you 30 days to try out their system before you’re locked into a 1 year contract so I kept TW for 3-4 days while I tested AT&T’s service. I had a 6-7 year old TW HD DVR that I hated. It would occasionally not record shows it should and interface was sluggish and took too many button presses to do some things IMO. And it only held about 30 hours of HD shows whereas the AT&T DVR seems to hold around 150 hours of HD shows (if you get their U300 or U450 service you get that larger capacity - don’t recall what capacity is for U100 or U200 but it’s less). TW signal so it would occasionally cut out for 1/2 a second so watching tv was annoying at times. TW’s internet service was reasonably reliable but the extreme cold caused my internet to go out for half a day multiple times in January.<br>
> ><br>> > After 4 weeks with AT&T’s service, I’m happy as DVR hasn’t missed a show and internet has been reliable even in the cold temperatures. AT&T will waive some, but not all of the installation fees and then give you a gift card so the end result is all the fees are covered. They seem to be making a big push to get new subscribers right now. They do give you a big discount to get you hooked. We’ll see what price they’re willing to give me in a year when the contract is up. I’m hopeful it will be reasonable since I’m lucky enough to have the options of TW, WOW, and UVerse in my neighborhood. At this point, I’ll stick with them if the price is reasonable and if not look into WOW.<br>
> ><br>> > Right now I’m paying what I was before with TW (and I had a pretty decent discount from TW’s listed prices) but also have a second box in the basement so I can watch tv while exercising. I’ve got a few more channels I actually want to watch and a larger capacity DVR that works well. I had TW’s 12-15 Mbps (can’t remember exact speed) internet service so internet speed is slightly faster than what I had.<br>
> ><br>> > I had checked my usage on my router last year and I was using 100-150 GB a month so the 250 GB (gigabyte not 250 Gb - gigabit) data cap doesn’t bother me too much. I suspect if you watch a lot of streaming video (we don’t have netflix) that could be an issue.<br>
> ><br>> > And yes, watch what the installer does so you can go back to TW if you want easily. I wanted the internet router in an upstairs bedroom/office so they ran the internet service (which is what the tv runs over too) up the phone line to that office. Then the box in the office splits out the tv and internet and they ran the tv data back down to the basement using the coax line in the office. Since I only have two tvs they put the actual DVR in the basement there and then are using a wireless box for the first floor tv. I think we could have run the signal back up to the first floor over the coax if we wanted.<br>
> ><br>> > I still have Vonage for my home phone (AT&T offered me 200 minutes for the price I’m currently paying Vonage for unlimited so I didn’t switch the phone). I told the installer I still wanted the phone outlets to work and he ran the internet up to the office over two of the four phone wires, put a double jack in the office and the other two wires run the phone back to the phone outlets throughout the house.<br>
> ><br>> > Dave<br>><br>><br>> _______________________________________________<br>> colug-432 mailing list<br>> <a href="mailto:colug-432@colug.net" target="_blank">colug-432@colug.net</a><br>> <a href="http://lists.colug.net/mailman/listinfo/colug-432" target="_blank">http://lists.colug.net/mailman/listinfo/colug-432</a><br>
><br>><br>><br>> --<br>> Jeff Stebelton GCIA GCIH GPPA GWAPT CEH SFCP<br>> _______________________________________________<br>> colug-432 mailing list<br>> <a href="mailto:colug-432@colug.net" target="_blank">colug-432@colug.net</a><br>
> <a href="http://lists.colug.net/mailman/listinfo/colug-432" target="_blank">http://lists.colug.net/mailman/listinfo/colug-432</a><u></u><u></u></p></div></div></div><p class="MsoNormal"><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <u></u><u></u></p>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"">Jeff Stebelton <span style="color:#1f1c1b">GCIA GCIH GPPA GWAPT CEH SFCP</span></span><u></u><u></u></p></div></div></div></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
colug-432 mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:colug-432@colug.net" target="_blank">colug-432@colug.net</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.colug.net/mailman/listinfo/colug-432" target="_blank">http://lists.colug.net/mailman/listinfo/colug-432</a><br>
<br></div></div>Spam detection software, running on the system "<a href="http://lists.colug.net" target="_blank">lists.colug.net</a>", has<br>
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message<br>
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label<br>
similar future email. If you have any questions, see<br>
the administrator of that system for details.<br>
<br>
Content preview: I switched to U-verse about 15 months ago when the monthly<div><br>
charge for DSL went up again. I didn't realized at the time that the telephone<br>
service, included with what I wanted was VOIP! The phone service kept dropping<br>
while maintaining the internet connectivity. It took three service calls<br>
by techs (?) of questionable ability (I was convince that the first one wasn't<br>
sure as to what end of the screwdriver was the handle). To shorten the story<br>
a bit the third technician did, indeed, know what he was doing solved the<br>
problem. Part of his solution was my calling the AT&T Business Office and<br>
demanding that my telephone service be returned to an analog line, while<br>
maintaining the same overall monthly rate (that was his suggestion and a learning<br></div>
experience for the customer service person I talked to). [...]<br>
<br>
Content analysis details: (5.6 points, 5.0 required)<br>
<br>
pts rule name description<br>
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------<br>
1.0 MSGID_MULTIPLE_AT Message-ID contains multiple '@' characters<br>
1.8 ONE_TIME BODY: One Time Rip Off<br>
0.7 MIME_HTML_MOSTLY BODY: Multipart message mostly text/html MIME<br>
0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message<br>
2.0 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60%<br>
[score: 0.5000]<br>
<br>
<br>
<br></blockquote></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
colug-432 mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:colug-432@colug.net" target="_blank">colug-432@colug.net</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.colug.net/mailman/listinfo/colug-432" target="_blank">http://lists.colug.net/mailman/listinfo/colug-432</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
colug-432 mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:colug-432@colug.net" target="_blank">colug-432@colug.net</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.colug.net/mailman/listinfo/colug-432" target="_blank">http://lists.colug.net/mailman/listinfo/colug-432</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div>
</div></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>
colug-432 mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:colug-432@colug.net">colug-432@colug.net</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.colug.net/mailman/listinfo/colug-432" target="_blank">http://lists.colug.net/mailman/listinfo/colug-432</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>