<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 02/12/2017 07:22 PM, Rick Hornsby
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAP--A0mboLpMEfLv-t844K4nJ4ekNKEbfDEXppxnUQ6MmEAB9Q@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite" class="clean_bq"><span>
<div>
<div>
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px
0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div style="word-wrap:break-word">
<div
id="gmail-m_-3654222169576365025bloop_customfont"
style="font-family:helvetica,arial;font-size:13px;color:rgb(0,0,0);margin:0px">
The normally very good Google mail spam
filters are eating not just
individual posts to COLUG, but now entire
threads are landing
there. Not cool.</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra">If you use Google mail filters,
there is
now an option for "Never send it to Spam" that I have
found
useful for mailing lists. It will still display a
message
saying it would have sent it to spam, but it goes to
the label and
not spam.</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</span></blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Thanks for that! I don't use the gmail web ui much anymore,
so I wasn't even aware this was an option now.</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
I use the web interface to GMail, Yahoo, MSN/Hotmail, ... when
forced to for purposes of setting extra stuff like this. Maybe it
gives them a way to present requisite advertising. (Since they <b>are</b>
free services.) Really thankful that I can use IMAP/SMTP (usu with
SSL) to do the real work. <br>
<br>
I've never used IMAP to man-handle spam. I've always gone to the
GMail spam folder and marked non-spam accordingly. <br>
<br>
Curious if the spam problem is reduced when using the ultra-secure
email services (e.g. Protonmail, Lavabit, Hushmail). <br>
<br>
-- R; <><<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>