[colug-432] OT: Columbus Botnet Siezed?

Angelo McComis angelo at mccomis.com
Fri Mar 18 10:45:11 EDT 2011


Through the process of elimination, I just talked to Gordon, and it was *not
* Scherers that was raided (aka Datacenter.bz).


On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Stephen Potter <spp at unixsa.net> wrote:

> On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 10:11:12 -0400, Ethan Dicks wrote
> > On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Joshua Kramer <josh at globalherald.net>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703328404576207173861008758.html
> > >
> > > Does anyone know which facility in Columbus this was?
> >
> > I was just reading that story and wondering the same thing.
>
> I wonder more about why Microsoft is being granted permission by the courts
> to act as a
> law enforcement agency. Shouldn't only law enforcement be allowed to be
> involved in
> raids and seizing of equipment?
>
> -spp
> _______________________________________________
> colug-432 mailing list
> colug-432 at colug.net
> http://lists.colug.net/mailman/listinfo/colug-432
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.colug.net/pipermail/colug-432/attachments/20110318/ccd3edd7/attachment.html 


More information about the colug-432 mailing list