[colug-432] Mozilla and Google conspiracy

[Michael Yanovich]

> Why should web developers support it when Mozilla won't?

I think this is the biggest reason for people to upgrade, pretty much
anything. If one wants support and expects something to work and be able
to push the blame for it not working off to the creator of the
project/software then you need to use at minimum what the
creator/developers are saying.

On 10/08/2012 01:14 PM, Rob Funk wrote:
> On Monday, October 08, 2012 01:09:07 PM Rob Funk wrote:
>> I'm a web developer, and to us, Firefox 3.6 is *ancient*. It's as bad as
>> IE8, which we really only still support because we still have to support
>> XP.
>>
>> FF 3.6 dates back almost three years now, and not only has lots of
>> security holes, but also doesn't support modern web standards. The web
>> has moved on quite a bit since then.
> 
> ... And most importantly, FF3.6 hasn't been supported by Mozilla since 
> April. Why should web developers support it when Mozilla won't?
> 
> _______________________________________________
> colug-432 mailing list
> colug-432 at colug.net
> http://lists.colug.net/mailman/listinfo/colug-432
> 
> 

-- 
Michael Yanovich

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 897 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.colug.net/pipermail/colug-432/attachments/20121008/ca7b207b/attachment.bin