[colug-432] Opinions on Certs?

[Rick Hornsby]

> On Dec 10, 2014, at 22:35, Zach Villers <zachvatwork at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I'm studying for an entry level cert, is there any preference for the RHCSA, vs LPIC-1 and LFCSA?
> 

It depends on what you want to do.  IIRC LPIC is more "pure" Linux - not as focused on a single distro and spends more time in the OS/shell than in Gnome/KDE.  When I was studying for the RHCSA, I noticed that RH's approach uses their GUI tools quite a bit.  

In my experience, servers are rarely running X.  You need to know how to manage, diagnose, and repair a host from the shell.  That's where I felt like the RH certification approach does a small amount of disservice.

I will be honest with you: if I'm interviewing you, I'll be happy you have a RH certification because  while not a replacement for experience, it tells me that you've made an investment in yourself and demonstrated some level of knowledge and skill.  But if I ask "how you do determine what DNS servers are configured?" and you say something about "click on this and click that to open some config tool" I'm going to ask you to explain it without the aid of a mouse.  (The correct answer is: look in /etc/resolv.conf).  If I ask what the MAC address of eth0 is, I'm looking something like "use the command ifconfig eth0" (not click on the icon of the Ethernet card).  I would imagine that most experienced *NIX admins would expect the same.

Full disclosure: I never followed through to take the RH exam when I meant to a couple of years ago.  Why not? I have several years of experience behind me, the time wasn't there and the ROI didn't seem worth it.  I also had very good teachers early on (at least one of whom is on this list, Tim Randles) and spent a ton of time figuring things out on my own, running my own production-like servers, etc.


> Thanks,
> Zach
> _______________________________________________
> colug-432 mailing list
> colug-432 at colug.net
> http://lists.colug.net/mailman/listinfo/colug-432