[colug-432] RedHat and CentOS buddy-up

[Joshua Kramer]

Scott: navigate to the FAQ page I linked, and search for some of the text I
included.  You'll find it.


On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Scott McCarty <scott.mccarty at gmail.com>wrote:

> Where is this documented, I am still trying to find this stated clearly in
> the announcements?
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Joshua Kramer" <joskra42.list at gmail.com>
> > To: "Central OH Linux User Group - 432xx" <colug-432 at colug.net>
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 8, 2014 1:51:52 PM
> > Subject: Re: [colug-432] RedHat and CentOS buddy-up
> >
> >
> >
> > Strange... the CentOS mailing list and RedHat's official statements
> > appear to differ.
> >
> > http://community.redhat.com/centos-faq/
> > Will this new relationship change the way CentOS obtains Red Hat
> > Enterprise Linux source code?
> > Yes. Going forward, the source code repository at git.centos.org will
> > replace and obsolete the Red Hat Enterprise Linux source rpms on
> > ftp.redhat.com .
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Scott McCarty <
> > scott.mccarty at gmail.com > wrote:
> >
> >
> > inline comments...
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Joshua Kramer" < joskra42.list at gmail.com >
> > > To: "Central OH Linux User Group - 432xx" < colug-432 at colug.net >
> > > Sent: Wednesday, January 8, 2014 12:25:45 PM
> > > Subject: [colug-432] RedHat and CentOS buddy-up
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > After reading this Wired article, I had to check my calendar to
> > > make
> > > sure it wasn't April 1st, or that I was mistakenly reading The
> > > Register.
> > >
> > > http://www.wired.com/wiredenterprise/2014/01/redhat-centos/
> > >
> > > Highlights:
> > >
> > > 1. Redhat is hiring CentOS developers to work on CentOS
> > > 2. The official source for source code used in RHEL will be
> > > git.centos.org
> >
> > This is the downstream code, not the upstream code.
> >
> > from:
> >
> http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2014-January/020100.html
> >
> > =============================================
> > - - Sources that we consume, in the platform, in the addons, or the
> > parallel stacks such as Xen4CentOS will become easier to consume with
> > a git.centos.org being setup, with the scripts and rpm metadata
> > needed
> > to create binaries being published there. The Board also aims to put
> > together a plan to allow groups to come together within the CentOS
> > ecosystem as a Special Interest Group (SIG) and build CentOS Variants
> > on our resources, as officially endorsed. You can read about the
> > proposal at http://www.centos.org/variants/
> > =============================================
> >
> >
> >
> > > 3. They are handing the CentOS trademark over to Redhat for
> > > protection and stewardship.
> >
> > Agreed
> >
> >
> > >
> > > I see good things ahead for CentOS!
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > colug-432 mailing list
> > > colug-432 at colug.net
> > > http://lists.colug.net/mailman/listinfo/colug-432
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > colug-432 mailing list
> > colug-432 at colug.net
> > http://lists.colug.net/mailman/listinfo/colug-432
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > colug-432 mailing list
> > colug-432 at colug.net
> > http://lists.colug.net/mailman/listinfo/colug-432
> >
> _______________________________________________
> colug-432 mailing list
> colug-432 at colug.net
> http://lists.colug.net/mailman/listinfo/colug-432
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.colug.net/pipermail/colug-432/attachments/20140108/8f9218f7/attachment.html